The mainstream media is trying to hide what just happened to two Democrat judges. According to reports, the judges were removed from office for “case-fixing schemes.” It looks like Americans will find out the truth after all.
The Pennsylvania Court of Judicial Discipline just revealed that one of the judges unethically intervened in cases, while the other was found “guilty of seven violations of judicial ethics rules, including bringing the court into disrepute.”
The Pennsylvania Court of Judicial Discipline made the decision to remove from office Municipal Court Judge Dawn Segal and Common Pleas Court Judge Angeles Roca because of their involvement in separate case-fixing schemes. The court’s rulings read:
“As we have said in more detail in prior decisions, when it comes to corrupt acts and the derogation of a fair and just judicial process, a judge must have ‘the willingness to stand up for what was right and buck a corrupt tide.’”
Both of the judges’ lawyers have informed that they are appealing the decisions to the state Supreme Court. Roca’s attorney, Samuel Stretton, said that he is deeply disturbed by the decision.
Last October, the disciplinary court found that Roca had unethically intervened in a tax case involving her son by calling then-Municipal Court Judge Joseph Waters Jr. Waters then reached out to Segal, who reversed herself and issued a ruling favorable to Roca’s son.
Waters is known for fixing cases on behalf of campaign donors and political allies. He even went to prison because of this, but was released after serving less than a year. Segal, on the other hand, was found guilty of seven violations of judicial ethics rules, including bringing the court into disrepute.
This is what Waters told Segal in an intercepted 2011 phone conversation in which he asked for favorable treatment of a politically connected defendant appearing before her:
“I got something in front of you at 1 o’clock today.”
Segal responded by saying:
“Oh, OK. OK.”
According to reports by American Lookout, both Roca and Segal are currently on unpaid suspension. If the rulings stand, they would be ineligible to hold judicial office in the future.
What do you think about this? Share this on Facebook and Twitter SCROLL DOWN FOR MORE